What the SGP Admins Say in Private
Filed Under (Roderick's Posts, cults/cultic, harassment, hyperpreterism, twaddle) by Roderick_E on 05-02-2009
Tagged Under : sgp, sovereign grace preterism, thuggery
As you read the title of this article you might be thinking, “How does he know what those guys say in private?”. Further you might ask, “Who are these SGP Admins & why are you talking about them”?
To answer the questions in reverse, let me summarize that SGP stands for “Sovereign Grace Preterism” — it is a community website which was started after a mass exodus of hyperpreterists from the premier hyperpreterist website, Planet Preterist. The hyperpreterists, began leaving Planet Preterist after it became increasingly liberal. Yet, this will always be the course of ANY hyperpreterist site or group, since by its very design, hyperpreterism is individualistic & “liberal” in that it liberalizes texts & concepts via rabid speculation & disconnection.
SGP is led by hyperpreterist teacher, Samuel Frost & his two main followers — Jason Bradfield & Michael Bennett. Bradfield is known for his constant “apologetic” of Frost — any time & any place Frost is mentioned in a unflattering way, Bradfield will be there to speak on Frost’s behalf. Whereas Bennett is known for his proof-texting & perhaps 100% agreement with everything Frost has EVER said.
Frost himself boasts of his talent & his two published books, even arrogantly claiming about one that “No one to date has answered it” yet ignoring that 2000 years of Christianity has ALREADY answered before Frost even wrote the book.
Anyhow, after becoming popularized on Planet Preterist & via speaking every year at the Planet Preterist conferences, Frost at some point kicks his benefactor to the curb. This is evident from a recent announcement given by a group of more conservative hyperpreterists of which Frost joined to be part of a book project. The announcement relates why Frost left Planet Preterist:
Sam announced on one of his podcasts that a “break“ was coming between him and Planet Preterist. This break was impending, Sam said, because of all the disturbing doctrines that are promoted at Planet Preterist. Specifically: Emergent errors, “we can’t know absolute truth,” “God does not know all things at all times,” no creeds, no systematic theology, Universalism, attacks on the doctrine of scriptural inerrancy, free will, etc., etc. (source)
The irony is, nothing much changed between the time Frost joined Planet Preterist & the time Frost left — it was “promoting” all of those “disturbing doctrines” the day Frost joined up with Planet Preterist & still the day he left & even now. No, Frost left Planet Preterist because he felt he was now big enough to strike out on his own.
Now, that you have a little back ground on what SGP is & how it was started, let us move to the first question. How would I know what is said by the SGP Admins in private…& really why should you care? Because, as is typical with hyperpreterists, their public & private communications are often very, very inconsistent.
For example, Bennett recently sent an email to several people, including myself of a picture of Dee Dee Warren & a picture of a depiction of the whore of Babylon side-by-side. Now, without ANY other explanation, what do you think such a thing was trying to convey?
Here is where the knowing what the SGP Admins say in private comes in.
I received an email sent out by Bradfield on behalf of the SGP Admins to the SGP members. According to the email, MANY of the members of SGP had contacted Bradfield to ask him about what was going on with Bennett & the lurid email he sent out about Dee Dee. (you’ll see Bradfield’s full email to the SGP in a moment). Well, what was ACTUALLY going on is an outside party, a man named Phil from Theology Today, got wind of Bennett’s email & publicly called for Bennett to repent AND to be admonished by Frost. Frost REFUSED to publicly admonish Bennett for something Bennett had done publicly & as a matter of fact Bennett was indignant toward Phil’s request even at one point emailing Phil using “LOL” - lots of laughs” in the subject line in response to Phil’s request that Bennett repent.
But what did the SGP Admins tell their members in private??? See for yourself. Below is Bradfield’s complete email on the issue. The email is nothing but DAMAGE CONTROL. I will BOLD important points I want to address.
A message to all members of Sovereign Grace Preterism
In keeping with policy, i did not want to post this on the site, but i do feel a need to clarify something, especially considering the fact that many of you have contacted me asking what is going on about “the email.”
Dee posted a pic of herself on her site. She’s sitting on a sign with hair weaves and a leopard skin outfit (shoes and coat).
When Mike Bennett saw it, it reminded him of a drawing he had seen elsewhere of a woman sitting on a beast, crazy outfit, etc.
Mike took the two pics, posted them side by side with no comments, and emailed it .
Now, when i first saw the email, i chuckled a little and deleted it. That was that. I did not know exactly what Mike intended for me to get out of it, other than a comparison of two crazy ladies.
That’s where my “clarkianism” kicks in. What all can i infer from two pics? I would argue not much of anything.
Apparently, the pic of the woman on the beast was of the “whore of bablyon”. Ya’ll have seen these pics - Hagee, Larkin, and others draw these pics of biblical characters, etc.
Well, they took the email to mean that Mike was calling Dee a “whore”. And that is NOT what Mike meant. It can’t be inferred from the email and if one would just call Mike up and talk to him about it, as i did, you’ll know that is the case.
Now, did i think that was a smart move on Mike’s part? No, because this is exactly what happens.
Phil posted a rebuke of Mike on SGP and i deleted it for two reasons:
1. Site policy regarding Dee
2. I felt they exaggerated the whole thingPlus, he accused the SGP crowd as a whole of “applauding” the email and most of you weren’t even aware of it.
So, that’s the story. I hope we’ll learn from this just how unsafe it is to give them ANYTHING, because Rod and Dee will exaggerate things well beyond the intended purpose. I encourage folks not to contact them in any form or fashion about anything. This is what happens.
Jason
Notice that he “feels the need to clarify” yet neither he nor Frost “felt the need” to call Bennett to repentance over this issue. This is just more outcropping of the hyperpreterist antinomian/anti-authoritarian mindset. They can’t “feel the need” to correct anything since they are sooooo much in error about their basic theology. Notice once again as I already mentioned, the SGP members were obviously wondering what was going on, but Bradfield was going to spin it for them.
Next, Bradfield pretends Bennett just happened to see a picture that reminded him of Dee Dee’s picture. No — the picture was CLEARLY a depiction of the Whore of Babylon of Revelation 17-18. If Bennett didn’t know this, it is MORE the reason he should not be teaching anyone anything about theology.
The comment about Bennett posting the pictures without comment is a outright LIE!!!!! — Bennett wrote in the email: “Sorry - couldn’t resist =)” If there was nothing wrong with what Bennett was doing, why should he be concerned whether he could or couldn’t resist doing it???
How does Bradfield claim he understood the pictures? First he shows us just how numbed he has become to these types of things, by saying he “chuckled a little bit & then deleted it & that was that”, no big deal I guess? — But then again, Bradfield himself goes around calling people “clowns” & “boobs” & even in this email says Bennett’s pictures were of “two crazy ladies”. I’m sure Bradfield didn’t bat an eye when he wrote that. But for Bradfield to claim he saw the pictures as “two crazy ladies” shows that he is either dishonest OR he also has such little theological knowledge that he didn’t initially realize the one picture was a depiction of the Whore of Babylon — again, another guy who should not be teaching anyone theology — “clarkian” or otherwise.
But then let’s see Bradfield’s logic in action. He claims that he couldn’t really infer anything from the side-by-side pictures right after he told us he DID infer that it was a “comparison of two crazy ladies”. See how dishonest these guys are when they get people in private — even dishonest with their OWN members. Amazing!
Then Bradfield plays off like he didn’t realize the picture was of the Whore of Babylon - - again, why is this guy trying to teach people theology OR logic???
The next bit by Bradfield is astounding. He implies that we were wrong to conclude Bennett was comparing Dee Dee to a whore, YET Bradfield admits he didn’t know what the picture was AND yet he “concluded” that it was a “comparison of two crazy ladies” (like that makes it better). But then Bradfield expects us to call up Bennett & ask him what he meant by it. Sheesh! But hey, Bradfield said he called up Bennett & Bennett told him he didn’t mean to compare Dee Dee to a whore — case closed, now don’t you feel so much better? Frost used to play this game when Virgil Vaduva of Planet Preterist was caught red-handed doing things like sending vampire scripts against other people’s websites — Frost told me that he had called up Vaduva & had these private conversations with Vaduva & all was well. No public admission, no repentance.
But Bradfield does seem to regret what Bennett did…but not because Bennett was comparing another man’s wife to a whore..or even to a “crazy lady” if we buy Bradfield’s cover story, but Bradfield thought it wasn’t a “smart move” because Bennett was called out publicly on it & Bradfield can’t have people making SGP & the hyperpreterism movement as a whole look bad.
Bradfield then gives a lame excuse as to why he deleted from SGP a public call for Bennett’s repentance. What??? Is that hitting too close to home?? Was it showing the SGP Admins in a bad, athough truthful light??? Nope, can’t have that.
After feeding that bull-story to SGP members, what was Bradfield’s conclusion? Not that Bennett did anything wrong, but that he & his SGP members “learn how unsafe it is to….” What? Get caught doing some unsavory thing? Learn that they should be more careful & perhaps not send emails to people who will ACTUALLY call them on it??? I do hope some of the SGP wise up to what is going on with their little group. It should give some person there with a conscience reason to question being led by guys like Frost, Bradfield, & Bennett — guys who write this kind of explanation to their members & hope they buy it.
To conclude, a little background info on the actual picture of Dee Dee — She is a big Apple/Macintosh fan & a once in a life time opportunity came up where she was able to go to “Mac World”. This involved flying, which was a great hurdle for her but with the Lord’s help, she got over her fear & got on that plane & went to Mac World. To add to the excitement & being who she is, Dee Dee decided to have fun & play on the fact that Apple released a new operating system called, guess what?? OS X LEOPARD. Hey, if Bennett & company got a little more creative, they could have zoomed in & seen that Dee Dee was even wearing Apple-shaped earrings.
So, here we have it. A couple of thuggish little punks, took another man’s wife moment of following a life’s dream & they marred it with childish & crude humor that we somehow aren’t suppose to “infer” anything from (what do I mean by that??? Maybe Bradfield’s “clarkian” mind will kick in & figure it out but I doubt since he couldn’t figure out the picture was of the Whore of Babylon).
Look you SGP members, I don’t care if you hate my guts, but if any of you have an ounce of decency, I would think you would be outraged by these guys. Chuck Coty???? You’re always soooo quick to depict your little group as soooo loving. What about it??? David Lee??? Kelly Birks??? Any of the women on SGP do you think this was appropriate?? Anyone?? Will anyone stand up to Frost & his little thugs???
P.S. SGP members, Bradfield “encourages you not to contact [us] in any form or fashion about anything” — nothing cultish there. Maybe he doesn’t want you to possibly learn the TRUTH about them.





I would also add that Bradfield is dishonest in pretending like this email was in isolation.
1. The hyperprets have been threatening me for a while that they are going to get my picture. I decided to remove that power from them and posted a fun picture in a place I thought I would never get to see. Michael Bennett SPECIFICALLY THREATENED me in an email previously that he was going to get my email and post “my ugly face” all over the Internet. Nice guy eh? Are all his opponents ugly or just the female ones? Misogynist much? So there is the context of Michael’s previous threat and within HOURS of my posting that pic he sends and email around supposedly ignorant of the whore of Babylon.
2. Michael sent the email to Roderick. Now why in the world would he do that? Because he is a no better than a street thug, and he wanted to be sure that I KNEW what he was doing. Why else send it to Roderick? You might ask why he didn’t send it to me directly - because since the time of his threats I have blocked emails from him.
3. Right after this, someone with “preterist” in their username went over to a friend of mine’s video and posted “Dee Dee Warren is the whore of Babylon” and accused me of flaunting my body in that picture. So much of me is covered I might as well be wearing a burqua.
So much for Bradfield’s Clarkian “logic” that couldn’t figure out why it was funny to wear a leopard coat and leopard shoes on the Apple sign. The current OS for the Mac is….. LEOPARD! I also brought a snow leopard coat since that is their next version to be released later this year. This is like explaining a joke to a roomful of blondes. Of course he doesn’t mention the context of the sign being the very famous 1 Infinite Loop sign at the Apple Campus. He just mentions that was sitting on a sign in a leopard outfit. Sorry but one of these things is not like the other.
And notice how Bradfield has to say I am “crazy”? Why is that? I guess all female opponent are ugly and crazy. So is any woman who wears a leopard print coat crazy? Is Bradfield aware that nearly any female that has a collection of coats will have at least one animal print one with leopard being the most popular? No that wouldn’t fit his story. The only article of clothing that was unusual were the shoes. They were hilarious. And notice how he characterizes me as wearing a leopard print “outfit.” Sorry but a coat and shoes are accessories. My outfit was [be forewarned and cover your children's eyes] A T-SHIRT AND BLUE JEANS! It was about 50 degrees out, thus the coat.
Now perhaps he is insinuating that I am crazy because I had a hair weave (not hair weaves btw - and even more specifically it is technically just braiding in additional hair and colours to my natural hair). Hmmm, is he insinuating that good ole white girls shouldn’t do their hair up like black girls. Why not? I am not ashamed to wear a hair style that is more popular amongst black women. I think some of the most beautiful women in the world are black women, think Naomi Campbell.
Now… if they were commenting on other material I posted AFTER that email, they will see that I do dress flamboyantly, but that outfit in front of Apple wasn’t one of them.
Is everyone who dresses flamboyantly crazy? Dr. James White wears funky ties to his debates, is he crazy? I dress all in colour because I enjoy life, and as a testimony to a tremendous work of healing that God performed with me on a Via de Cristo weekend. The theme song for the weekends is “All in Colour” (originally in Spanish decolores):
Even when I am deeply depressed I try to bring some brightness, fun, and colour into the lives of others.
Figures it is hyperpreterists who take something joyful and a testimony to God and try to paint it as lurid and sinful.
Michael specifically threatened to harass me with a photo of me. He then emails that. Connect the dots. If you can’t, you have a seared conscience or are deductionally incompetent.
By all means obey your masters and don’t contact me. That is scarily cultic. Bradfield is now telling you who to contact or not? Heelloooo???? Red flags should be going off everywhere folks. This is what Jehovah’s Witnesses and Scientologists do. Obviously hyperpreterism is not a full-blown cult as those two groups are, but they are becoming increasingly cultic. If you decide you want to live dangerously my email is preteristblog@gmail.com.
If you want to live really dangerously and see the evil that exists within the hyperpreterist movement go to http://www.preteristpodcast.com and listen to episode 20. It is also listed in iTunes as The Preterist Podcast.
Oh and I forgot to add another contextual item that shows Bradfield is spinning like a DJ. ALL of them are aware that one night in a Paltalk room where all the major players are present, one of them (the guy has since turned atheist) said:
Dee Dee Warren is a whore.
So it isn’t like this “whore” association just fell out of the blue sky. There is a definite back story, and Jason’s PR ain’t cutting it. Not one bit. Michael has a well-known and earned reputation as an email bully and spammer. This fits definitely in his pattern and practice.
Mike Bennett responds by sending me an email with Bennett’s typical color coding & attempt to make me look like a hypocrite by quoting things I said favorably of hyperpreterism WHILE I was a hyperpreterist — Um DUH!!! Mike, I said those things while I was a dupe of the “movement”. But what I wanted to bring out is this part of Mike’s email:
First off, Mike I find it difficult to believe “you didn’t mean to hurt” anyone when you make a side-by-side comparison of them with a Whore. If you are really this dumb about things, then I really, really, really urge you to quit writing anything that might influence people in a theological or “logic” way, since your “logic” is very, very skewed.
Secondly, I find it amazing that how right AFTER your feigned apology, you turn around & once AGAIN compare Dee Dee to the Whore of Babylon — metaphorical or otherwise. But even more telling of your cultish mentality, you equate yourself & your fellow hyperpreterists with “true Christians”. Mike, don’t you see ANYTHING cultish in this??? Here you are, a guy part of a religious movement that is a complete disconnect from the historic Christianity of 2000 years & you consider yourself a “true Christian” in opposition to all of those other Christians???? Something is seriously, seriously wrong with your thinking. It sounds more & more like Mormons & JWs who think they are “true Christians” who are being “persecuted” by whom??? The historic Church that rejects Mormonism & JWs as cults. Let us now add hyperpreterism to the group of cults as we now see clearly the cultish mentality of this group.
SGP members, again whether you hate mine or Dee Dee’s guts, don’t you think it is time to re-evaluate what you got yourself into with hyperpreterism??? I know it might have sounded “cool” at first, but look at its fruits. Not just this issue but a 10-20 years history of this kind of stuff. Wake up!
Well apologies from liars mean nothing, and while I realize that everything with a lot of hypers is about “feelings,” Mike is too juvenile to ever “hurt my feelings.” Note how once again he gets a dig in there. No Mike, my feelings weren’t hurt, I am just exposing you for the malicious lying thug you are. Since you decided to lie again, I will expose it further. And since we expected Samuel to rebuke you, and Samuel has lied himself, maybe I will throw that in for good measure.
Samuel, if you don’t like me quoting you with your stupid legal disclaimer, I have two comments for you.
1. Fair use
2. Go ahead, sue me. I would love to get publicity on how crooked the hyperpreterist movement is. I doubt you want that. I work for a law office, your silly legal threats may scare the ignorant, but you don’t frighten or bully me.
Jason, Mike and Sam have all recently outright lied, and you trust these people as teachers? People wake up.
The incipient misogyny raises its head again as Michael feels he has the right to comment on something that is none of his business. What I wear. I will post the picture here in another post. To describe it as gaudy is ridiculous. Now I do wear a lot of gaudy things. That ain’t one of them. And what I wear is my husband’s business, not his.
Where are the hyperpreterist women of courage? Shame on you.
Conniption ensues over on SGP. Someone(s) have been telling the inside story of SGP & now the SGP Admins can’t handle it. Jason Bradfield intends to delete all the inactive accounts in hopes of routing out what he is calling a “mole”. No cultic behavior there. Why does Jason & the SGP gang assume the person(s) is/are inactive? Matter of fact, it could very well be someone(s) of their own mindset but has just gotten tired of the thuggery over there. Look, they are all in a tizzy about this BUT THEY STILL HAVEN’T DEALT WITH WHAT MIKE BENNETT HAS DONE. But they are over there patting themselves on the back about how this has “brought them together” — Yes, when a cult is under scrutiny, it tends to close-ranks, Waco Texas anyone?
Further, showing how weak-willed Jason Bradfield is, he admits that he has set the sites of SGP critics on block & had to set up a random password to keep himself from the urge of visiting the sites. This is the kind of people leading the hyperpreterist movement. First Tim King, then Terry Hall, Virgil Vaduva, Don Preston (with his “I’m leaving my congregation because they won’t financially support my agenda to promote hyperpreterism”), Sam Frost & his little 1 Cor 5 followers.
I went and read it. It is seriously sick that they would not even deal with what Michael did. Joking about a “mole.”
Well folks, in the real world, when someone exposes internal sins and hypocrisy they are called a whistle-blower and is someone to be respected. Even more if the wrong-doers repent rather than circle the wagons.
[...] order to have the appropriate full background for this post, it is necessary to read Roderick’s prior post on this matter. Since Roderick’s posting, the lies have only spread and the web more [...]
[...] assistant coach Jason Bradfield to play spin master and make excuses for his players poor conduct. (source) (source) [...]
[...] What the SGP Admins Say in Private [...]