When Integrity Comes to SGP
Filed Under (Roderick's Posts, cults/cultic, history, humour, hyperpreterism) by Roderick_E on 18-03-2009
Tagged Under : dave green, David Green, sgp
What happens when a person becomes accustomed to a culture of lies, cover up, & good ole boy back patting & then someone who is supposed to be part of the “group” comes & displays some integrity? This very situation has recently happened on SGP (hyperpreterist website — home to the pseudo-conservative hyperpreterists — I like to call it Super-Great-People, since its leaders/founders think it is the best thing since sliced bread).
From its very beginning SGP has been a place, a culture of deceit, hyprocrisy, & cover up & that’s all before we even get to the doctrine it advocates. In recent times, SGP’s leaders have been involved in unrepentant actions of referring to another man’s wife as whore. Sam Frost, SGP de facto leader & protege of Virgil Vaduva has been the biggest culprit in justifying the culture of SGP.
But recently, Dave Green (another long time hyperpreterist who has just recently started to interact with the wider movement in more detail), has joined SGP. Green has been cited before as a guy who though wrong on his doctrine, has had the integrity to be honest in other areas of his life.
Green had posted a statement on his own website (source) & it was duplicated on SGP by Sam Frost (source) — without a source link back mind you, typical of Frost’s methodology. But hey, maybe Frost doesn’t think he needs to source link back, now that he thinks he & Green & suddenly “good buddies”.
Anyhow, the summary of the posting is that Green says that if “futurism” is true, then yes hyperpreterism is a damnable heresy. Of course, Green claims that HISTORIC CHRISTIANITY (what Green is calling “futurism”) is not true.
Green goes on to try to claim that HISTORIC CHRISTIANITY is a “mind-boggling, exegetical jumble to be sure; but it’s not a damnable, mind-boggling, exegetical jumble.” Interesting — so 2000 years of Christianity has been this messed up??? Again, hyperpreterism is built on a huge conspiracy theory…& I think Green is honest enough to admit it…but he’d say, like other hyperpreterists that ‘Sola Scriptura overrides the traditions of men’. It sounds good, but the problem is, the modern Evangelical & the Hyperpreterist definition of Sola Scriptura is actually SOLO Scriptura which amounts to private interpretation divorced from 2000 years of Holy Spirit guided Christianity. — Again, hyperpreterism is built on a conspiracy theory.
But what I really wanted to address in line with the title of this article is what happens when a guy like Green enters SGP where the SGP leaders aren’t accustomed to their own people showing integrity.
SGP Founder, Jason Bradfield & the real brains behind it — Frost is just a celebrity & Mike B an embarrassment — Bradfield had these comments for Green.
And Dave, what you said about Mathison is exactly what puzzles me about you - it seems as though you are trying to throw a life preserver to the futurists…giving them an excuse to condemn us. Now, i understand that ULTIMATELY you do not agree with the way they handle the text(s); so in that sense you are not excusing them. But it seems as though you’re trying to excuse them a bit by saying, “well, they are at least being consistent within their framework on this verse.” I don’t agree with that at all and don’t understand why you would force that. — Bradfield
See, Bradfield who SAYS he doesn’t read the most active opponent sites against hyperpreterism, is here complaining that Green is giving too much credit to the opponents of hyperpreterism. I think Bradfield wanted to see Green indulge him in his own lies & self-imposed ignorance.
Green responds to Bradfield…not with the typical SGP cronie response that would have said, “Oh Jason you are right. I should have never doubted your clarkian logical mind”, instead Green says:
It’s easy for too many [hyper] preterists to demonize and ridicule futurists and call them hate-mongering bigots because they reject us as damnable heretics. Such [hyper] preterists need more understanding and maturity. Many futurists are simply following the Word of God faithfully as they understand it within their framework. — Green
Uh-oh!
Bradfield cannot let that stand, he responds:
Again, this is what blows my mind. Basically, what all this boils down to, is that you, as a [hyper] preterist, are wanting to give them more wiggle room to condemn us and in the process attack fellow [hyper] preterists as immature and ignorant who think you’re putting too much into this verse.
lol..i don’t get it at all. I don’t see how this is fruitful at all. — Bradfield
Anyone notice how these guys are sounding more & more like their mentor, Vaduva? — “waaaah, you’re attacking me!!!”. I guess it is only “fruitful” when you tow the line Dave.
True to his form, Dave is not intimidated by Bradfield’s passive-aggressive methods. Green replies with a bit of sarcasm mixed with a rebuke for I would think not only Bradfield but the very culture of SGP:
Yes, exactly Jason. I love being condemned by others. Or, maybe there’s another possiblity. Maybe truth is more important than getting the rhetorical upper hand over my theological enemies. — Green
Wait Dave!!! I thought it was more important to back your “fellow [hyper] preterists” homeboys even if it means covering up for liars.
Green continues:
Yes, you’re right. What possible fruit could there be in promoting understanding, patience and kindness to our (theological) enemies. That’s stupid. Your [Jason] way is much better. — Green
Bradfield hasn’t yet replied but I’m sure he is steaming, after all none of his own “fellow [hyper] preterists” have even come close to rebuking the guy for ANYTHING he has ever done.
Maybe Frost will have a phone conversation with Green & then go back & tell Bradfield he worked it all out & everything is fine now…just how Frost did when Vaduva was doing some of the despicable things he did & instead of calling Vaduva to PUBLIC repentance, a winky-wink phone call from Frost fixed it all up. So, Jason, don’t be angry with Green. Green lives in a different world than you & your buddies. To Green, at least in principle he says “truth is more important than getting the rhetorical upper hand”. If he continues with this, Green will eventually renounce hyperpreterism as the lie it is. Then you can really get back at him Jason — you can say stuff like, “I knew Dave was a closet futurist since no ‘fellow [hyper] preterist’ would admit to the things Dave did.”
Then maybe Dave will be considered a “mole” & be removed from SGP.





See why I like David? Of course he has his faults, but he is so honest on that point.
Where is Sam’s apology for saying I misrepresented David? Oh yeah, it is where his apology is for defending one of his flock for sending around a picture of me claiming I was the refulfillment of the Whore of Babylon. Silly me.
Samuel has no business in a leadership position of any kind. But then again, who am I to tell cults how to run themselves.
I went and read the further comments. First Jason is a LIAR once again. He is pretending like the apology he owes me if for a youtube comment that I NEVER SAID he definitely made. I said (and I can prove it you liar Jason), is that EITHER Jason or someone trying really hard to make it look like Jason did. I don’t which is true; thus I don’t expect Jason to apologize for something he says he didn’t do and that I don’t know if he did or didn’t.
Dave sees through Jason’s nonsense. There is something I am dying to write Dave and ask, but David and I agreed not to discuss Samuel in email any longer for the sake of our friendship but that I would say whatever I needed to about Samuel here, and David could say whatever he wanted elsewhere so that it would be a public rather than personal correspondence.
David, I believe Samuel is lying when he claimed you laughed at the fact that I can believe you hold to heresy and yet still be an honest person. Who is right here Dave? As far as I see it there are three options.
1. Samuel is lying (something that is becoming habitual for him)
2. You are being two-faced (which I would count as a probability of .0001% because you are not that kind of person).
3. Samuel is twisting and re-interpreting what really happened to “use” you as he does nearly everyone else with credibility since his is shot
I would really appreciate it Dave if you clarified that over there.
Jason the apology you owe is for other things. Would you like me to repost the Blind Men article? I would be MORE than happy too.
As I said before, I am waiting for everyone to move onto to something else, then I will rebut the points that need rebutting. I want to make sure their point is made in full.
Oh and Samuel did lie about something earlier David. He said “her tauting Dave Green .” Did I taunt you on Iron Sharpens Iron? Did not post I and the host say favourable things about your honesty?
Are you going call out Samuel on this David?
Awww, Jason couldn’t let Dave’s rebuke of Jason stand so Jason decided to selectively apply SGP’s ostrich policy & remove the former posting & bury the rebukes: http://preterism.ning.com/profiles/blogs/repost-dave-green-on-2-timothy