Prophecy, Interrupted (feedback requested)
Filed Under (Author, Dee Dee Warren) by dee dee on 20-07-2012
Tagged Under : Bible-Daniel-9, Prophecy Interrupted
Print This Post
I am working on my short commentary/explanation of Daniel 9 with a new working title of “Prophecy, Interrupted.” It is not intended to be a major work like “It’s Not the End of the World” but still more than a simple short article. If I wait until it is in nearly a final form, it won’t be posted for several years. It took me that long before I posted the Matthew 24 commentary, but I still did major revisions afterwards.
So, I am toying with the idea of posting it when it is at a point where it will be helpful but still have some major fleshing out to do. IOW, the broad outlines will be there, with more meat added to the bones over the next year or so.
Good idea or bad idea?
Overall I think its a good idea as long as you present the basic outline in a clear enough format so your concept doesn’t get distorted.
Does that make sense?
That is what I was thinking, and then perhaps have a revisions notes section where folks can see where things were added.
We are talking about perhaps a 30 page paper thus far…. not the 150 page behemoth that is the Matthew 24 piece.
Hey Dee, please take a look at my article on Daniel 9 for any reference you might care to expand on or not. It’s on my site. Thanks for the FB confirm too. Take care.
Will do Ken.
What I am doing right now is going through my old notes and trying to organize them (notes not just on Daniel but on tons of subjects as what I would do when I was in forum debates is copy and paste any significant responses into random word documents so I have hundreds of pages of just stuff)
Dee, that’s great! It sounds like an interesting and informative idea then. I’m on board. :o)
As long as it includes an interpretation in light of the parallel prophecies of Daniel 7, 8, and 10-12, I am all for it!
Sorry, had to plug the “scholar’s consensus”.
Go for it, Dee Dee, I would honestly consider - and eagerly read - whatever you write, however unlikely I would be to agree. Peace, Sister!
James, I don’t think we will disagree on anything in this piece. Though I have strayed from working on it the past week. I always have too many irons in the fire. I have to finish editing my Matthew 24 commentary! Though that is being driven by a great guy, Chris, who has volunteered to head that up since I am an awful editor of my own work. His suggestions have added needed clarity.