Gary and the hyperpreterists sitting in a tree…..
Filed Under (hyperpreterism, twaddle) by dee dee on 14-08-2008
Tagged Under : Gary DeMar
Gary DeMar is in self-destruct mode. Why do I say that? He continues to give legitimacy to hyperpreterism and “answer” charges that were not made. He repeats ad nauseam his mantra - “if you disagree with hyperpreterism then do the exegetical work” and “have you done it, is it published?”
Gary is either beknighted or outright dishonest.
http://www.preteristsite.com/contrahym.html
There is TONS of material refuting hyperpreterism exegetically. He knows it. So why does he act like he hasn’t? Is that an honest way to answer real concerns? Oh yeah, that’s right, why does Gary have to answer to anyone?
And to answer you personally Gary, yes I HAVE done the exegetical work. Here is one such piece:
http://www.preteristsite.com/docs/warrengrave.html
which sent your hyperpreterist conference roommate Samuel Frost into a meltdown.
http://www.preteristsite.com/docs/warrenfrosty.html
But what is more interesting is that Gary seems to be conceding that HE HASN’T DONE THE EXEGETICAL WORK NECESSARY TO SHOW WHY HE ISN’T A HYPERPRETERIST. Is this who then should be the main spokesman for preterism when he keeps repeating “the hyperpreterists are asking good questions”? Well Gary, can YOU answer them? If not, why don’t you take a break from preaching to dispensationalists when you can’t even answer or refute arguments from within your own camp. I hope the dispensationalists and premills pick up on this and run it into the ground. That flushing sound is Gary’s credibility. Sickening.
Of course Gary won’t answer that. Why does he have to answer to anyone? I mean, after all, he only tours and goes on shows and holds himself out as an expert on prophecy and proponent of preterism and can’t even answer the most basic of hyperpreterist arguments, by his own admission. Or if he can, and I misread him, why isn’t he? Why is just attacking others with the same old soundbytes instead of showing that he has good exegetical reasons he is not a hyperpreterist? Yes, Gary I have done the exegetical work. HAVE YOU? If not, perhaps you should not be so eager to be the preterist representative.
PS: This is posted here since Gary DeMar blocks my posts. Yet allows all kinds of foul hyperpreterist garbage to go past. The hyperpreterists are now quoting the most virulent and hateful of atheists to support their cause. Here’s a free clue Mr. Hyperpreterist: that same atheist would think your arguments are full of crap as well, and would be glad to show you so. Do you have no shame or self-respect? Does Gary that he allows such to be posted on his blog?
Ugh.
Hey Gary, at a hyperpreterist forum where they are rah-rahing what a cheerleader you are for their cause (Biblical Worldview my left foot! you don’t think the resurrection is a salvational doctrine), and here is what one of them said:
It is your foul bedfellows Gary that say the most your are a closet hyperpreterist.
Boo. Hiss.
Tee hee…was that an intentional pun about Sam FROST going into a MELTDOWN?
Yes actually. Samuel has absolutely no sense of humour so I love the word play. The most creative he gets is “Queen of Stupid.” A second-grader could go better, at least poopy-head would be funnier.
Anyways Gary has gone into a bigger self-immolation than I thought when I first wrote this. His last post has caused to consider whether this man should ever be held up as a teacher of eschatology.
I know I will be creating an in-depth warning page to put next to any time I may cite him.
It is pathetic that his Reformed friends and peers put up with this kind of thing - where are the prominent Reformed men with a backbone? (I am not speaking of the laypeople such as yourself and Roderick - the laypeople don’t have to worry about the Good Ole Boys club which is alive and well in Christianity) (and yes there are some pastors I know who are speaking out, but I am talking about the men with a publishing platform and as much prominence as Gary) It turns out that Gary is a practical postmodernist. Words mean nothing to him - they are silly putty. Oh wait… IRONY…. isn’t that what he claims dispensationalists do? ROFL!!!!!
Please, if anyone has contacts with any prominent dispensationalists (I don’t) get them this information. He has no right to be critiquing them - his own eschatological house is a freakin’ mess.
Hey Gary, if soon must mean soon, why can’t resurrection mean resurrection? I could turn all your arguments against you.
Don’t get me started. He is making a class A fool of himself and bringing shame upon Christ. He doesn’t even know why he isn’t a hyperpreterist! Not for sure. He hasn’t done the necessary exegetical work, yet he PRESUMES to teach others on the subject and publish books that he self-promotes as the most complete eschatology study ever written or some other such garbage on his show with his ad for Last Days Madness. He doesn’t even define the resurrection properly in that book.
ROFFLE!!! LMBO!!!!
The pup thinks he can vomit up one of his spam emails. It is interesting though to note how DeMar is the hyperpreterist champion.
One of two things will happen.
1. DeMar will, for whatever reason, by their zealous prostitution, distance himself forcefully.
2. DeMar will discredit himself by not distances himself
This whole drama has shown how much, in reality, that DeMar is the hyperpreterist’s trophy wife.
The pup is also disobeying its master. I am royalty. The Queen of Stupid. He should address me by his master’s chosen title.