A Review of the Mindless Ramblings From the Sleepless in Seattle

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 18-08-2010

Tagged Under : , ,

Ed Hassertt and his fellow cosmonauts over at preteristcosmos have undermined historic Christianity over an argument with Sam Frost dealing with the doctrine of infinity and the elect of God. Read the rest of this entry »

Hyperpreterisms Foundation, “Christian” Liberalism

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 02-08-2010

Tagged Under : , , ,

As we’ve noted several times Hyperpreterism advocates a view “like” the Gnostics of the 2nd Century in redefining the nature of the resurrection of the dead along mystical lines.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jolly Green Theology!

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 04-07-2010

Tagged Under : , ,

Sam Frost over the last several weeks has been taking the few over at Preteristcosmos to task for their contradictory view of God.  Sam has pointed out very effectively that the elect are numbered therefore a finite group.  Sam has provided Scripture to back up his position effectively arguing that God knows all the all and that the claim of Green and company the elect are innumerable logically contradicts the nature of the who and what of God.  Indeed Green, Hassert and Sullivan are arguing as a requirement of the hyperpreterist paradigm the elect are an infinite number requiring there to always be one more for God to know.  What is ironic in all this is the preteristcosmonauts, (read that some where and couldn’t stop laughing) accuse Sam of putting God in man’s box while just the opposite is the case.

Read the rest of this entry »

What’s New at The Preterist Site

Filed Under (dee dee's posts, what's new) by dee dee on 26-06-2010

Updates after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

Edwards, Class Is In!

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 06-06-2010

Tagged Under : ,

Roderick’s response is exactly why we are so willing to trade Frost for Edwards (I liken it to buying Manhattan Island from the Indians for a few bottles of cheap whisky, some beads, and a few bucks!). Edwards writes:

Read the rest of this entry »

Hyperpreterists Welcome Edwards Home in Trade for Frost!

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 05-06-2010

Tagged Under : , , ,

In an effort to address recent concerns of our readership we are reporting on the most recent development in the hyperpreterist community.

Read the rest of this entry »

Roderick Continues to Slander

Filed Under (dee dee's posts) by dee dee on 15-05-2010

Tagged Under : , , ,

Seriously, any Christian associating with Roderick should call upon to him repent and to follow proper procedures for accusing an elder. Samuel Frost RIGHTLY says:

a puppet king would require a puppet. I am no puppet. Green’s remarks is an exercise in stupidity.

Read the rest of this entry »

A Legend In His Own Mind, Rodericke Edwards

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Paul on 13-05-2010

Tagged Under :

This has really gotten out of hand. But, I think I know how to straighten it out. I will contact Dr. Talbot and arrange for you, Rodericke Edwards to debate him in a public setting in Chicago. That isn’t too far from where you live. I’m sure Dr. Talbot would arrange to have Dr. Kenneth Gentry and Dr. Gary DeMar in attendance as well. That way we can listen 1st hand to you expose him on what is and is not an effective apologetic against heresy. You have my email, contact me to confirm via that method as Dee Dee, can’t say as I blame her, won’t let you post here at Preteristblog.

Read the rest of this entry »

Warming up the Frost

Filed Under (hyperpreterism) by dee dee on 20-04-2010

Tagged Under :

At the risk of causing even further ego inflation, it is a fact that Samuel Frost is considered the “scholar” of the hyperpreterist movement. As such, I think it is important to keep a loose index of articles directed towards his works. This post is such a list, with a master list to be maintained HERE at The PreteristSite.

Read the rest of this entry »

Green Goes to Lyon

Filed Under (Paul's posts) by Paul on 18-04-2010

Tagged Under : , , , , , ,

Dave Green pleads,

Biological reanimation is not the resurrection and the life.  Jesus is the resurrection and the life.  To live (i.e. to be resurrected) is to believe in Him 

Pothinus, Bishop of Lyon replies,

No, to believe is to begin the way of salvation.  The end of the way is the redemption of the body.  You error in knowing the Scriptures, the Apostle Paul himself wrote explaining to the brethren in Corinth, “this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality.”, which when it comes to pass, “Death is swallowed up in victory.” 

Green responds,

Yes, but Valentius explains in his treatise on the resurrection, “He put aside the world which is perishing; he transformed himself into an imperishable Aeon and raised himself up, having swallowed the visible by the invisible, and he gave us the way of our immortality.  Then indeed, as the apostle said, ‘We suffered with him, and we arose with him, and we went to heaven with him.’”  Pothinus, there is no need for you to suffer the penalty that will inevitably befall you should you not recant. Do the right thing, follow the teaching of Valentius then you and your folk will be spared from your impending death. 

Pothinus eyes his adversary and states emphatically,

For me to die is gain, I cannot recant the hope that lies within me. May God have mercy on you. 

Read the rest of this entry »