Filed Under (Uncategorized) by dee dee on 22-05-2009
Thank you Sharon, Minna, and Willy for your comments at your site. You guys are very kind to support me like this. I would do the same for you.
I see that Samuel Frost has posted that he does not know who was behind that site. That is not true. He does know at least one person who was involved because I told him.
Samuel says:
As if we all do this, or condone it, or support it, or sweep it under the rug.
Actually Samuel YOU do. It is your “dear brother” who was involved and is currently threatening me to do it again. You participated in the thread where your “dear brother” posted some of my personal information again. You didn’t say a peep to your “dear brother” about this. You hit a new low by being so two-faced as to support your “dear brother” to his face and then go to Sharon’s site and act all virtuous with regards to this situation. At least your “dear brother” is consistent and doesn’t try to pretend otherwise.
Read the rest of this entry »
Sharon Nichols has defended the lockdown over at SGP by stating that:
Lately, Roderick Edwards seems quite perturbed because SGP has decided to make their site private, viewable to members only. I say this because recently Roderick has mentioned this more than once, and not in such respectable language I might add. As if an internet group doesn’t have that option. Can’t say I blame them though, especially when there are people like Roderick lurking in the shadows like a wolf ready to pounce on the first thing that looks juicy enough to tear into.
Actually Roderick isn’t the first to bring it up. I was. You, Sharon, have indicated that you did not wish to get involved in the SGP controversy (which Larry libelously insinuates is gossip-that time-old refuge of those trying to avoid confronting sin). [Yoda] You either do, or you do not. [/Yoda] You cannot pick and choose. The issue of the propriety of the locking of the compound, as I will explicate below, is intimately tied to the exposed and unrepentant sins of its leadership. If you are going to defend the lock-down, then I call upon you to deal with the accusations. If you don’t wish to deal with those accusations (as I told you, I would not push you on that) then stay out of it. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
Read the rest of this entry »
Filed Under (dee dee's posts) by dee dee on 02-05-2009
I accept your apologies and all is forgotten. You may disregard my request not to contact me any longer as part of my acceptance of your apologies. Thank you for apologizing and for doing so very quickly.
Read the rest of this entry »
Okay, tonight I was going to record another episode, and as I was finishing up my notes, I realized that the material was becoming too confusing to follow without a prior article outlining all of the finer details. So, I decided I must write the article first, and then just give highlights in the podcast, referring anyone who is really interested to the written piece. This serves two important purposes. One, clarity. Two, it will free my listeners who aren’t interested in the latest hyperpreterist shenanigans to get the Cliff’s Notes version and move on. Please be advised, however, that ever since my recent podcast in which I finally exposed to the light the wickedness of certain hyperpreterists towards me a few years back, I am determined not to keep silent again. When they lie or play dirty tricks, I am going to call them on it. Some, such as Sharon Nichols, may dismiss such as ad hominem. Well, sorry friends, but in Christianity, character matters. Orthodoxy should lead to orthopraxy. When we see such outright abusive and dishonest behaviour of people claiming to be Christians (nigh, even leaders), their orthodopraxy IS relevant to their doctrine. Notice, I said claiming to be Christians. I do not accept that claim, and I do not believe that it is a coincidence that so many people have had similar unorthopraxic experiences with this particular unorthodox (heretical) group.
Read the rest of this entry »
